The fall of the Soviet Union was a major political event for us in the third world, but it was not the same intellectual influence in the west, and the reason that Western communities had long passed the traditional Soviet version of Marxistism and went towards more open and sophisticated forms of ideology and democracy.
In Europe and America, the Linnesian Marxist associated with communist parties has not spread as much as deeper and more humane intellectual currents, such as the ideas of Frankfurt School, the writings of Marquez, Eric Frum and Altser, which are more concerned with humans, alienation, culture and freedom than with political slogans and traditional economic conflict. Even the ancient British Workers ' Party did not inherit Marxie Lenny, but on human left traditions of a professional and democratic nature.
In the Sudan and the Arab world, a large part of the left remained linked to the old Soviet model, so the collapse of the Soviet Union seemed to be a complete collapse of an idea, and hence what was known within the Sudanese Shi ' a Party was known as«General debate»The one that ended - in many eyes - with a more administrative figure than a mind-set, which was described by the late ring as a luxury when it was marked by a sword that whispered the grass into the sword until the hugs were lifted to ease their cut.
While the West has moved beyond this stage since the 1960s, our debate has been taking place within old and closed frameworks, because the crisis has not only been political, but also cultural and social, the patriarchal community, culture of trusteeship and the sharp division between modernity and tradition have made many intellectuals live in a situation that is torn between two different worlds.
The concept of the left in the west is therefore fundamentally different from that in our region: there is only one component of left thinking, not a single closed doctrine or reference, and the continuous analysis is no longer separate from the cultural and social analysis, because any humanitarian phenomenon that cannot be understood outside its cultural and cultural context.
Therefore, speaking of Marxian in the English, French or German-speaking world is a very different intellectual and cultural reality than the communist parties in our Arab and African region. We are here before two different worlds: one that has emerged within democratic and open societies, and the other within societies that have been violated by patriarchal culture and intellectual trust.
ولعل ما أورده الدكتور حيدر إبراهيم على ــ شفاه الله ومتعه بالصحة والعافية ــ يلخص هذه الأزمة حين نقل تعليق إدوارد عطية عن معاوية نور، إذ قال ما معناه إن الرجل يعيش ممزقًا بين عالمين: عالم للنساء وآخر للرجال.
Talat Muhammad al-Talib
talaat1706@gmail.com
